Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Gnireenigne

It follows from Rule 34 that given "porn of it", one should be able to work backwards and reverse-engineer the original, inspirational "it".

The logic is geometric and unassailable... yet in this case the only output from the software is the 'Divide by Zero' warning.

8 comments:

mikey said...

Stacked Overflow...

zombie rotten mcdonald said...

pushing a rope....

ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said...

Illegal Operation.
~

Smut Clyde said...

Segment access violation. Heap corruption.

zombie rotten mcdonald said...

Malformed Scuzzy chain.

zombie rotten mcdonald said...

Defenestrated Windows.

Smut Clyde said...

It has belatedly occurred to me that there is a flaw in my logic -- I have assumed that the operation 'IsPornOf(x)' has an inverse operation, i.e. that the Intertubes has the properties of a group.

But suppose the Interlattice is a ring?

zombie rotten mcdonald said...

That's what I was thinking.